跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论的是图模型精度矩阵估计的收敛速率理论,属于高维统计与图模型方法,未涉及所提供领域细分中的因果推断、面板、时间序列或金融计量等方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shuheng Zhou

Bigraphical 与张量图 Lasso 估计量的有限样本收敛速率

研究问题
摘要称,本文关注矩阵正态与张量值数据下精度矩阵估计的收敛速率问题,特别是双向 Kronecker 和模型此前缺乏有限样本理论保证的缺口。
方法与思路
作者提出对 Bigraphical Lasso 与 TeraLasso 估计量的相对误差界进行改进,在算子范数与 Frobenius 范数下将界收紧约 log p 倍,并据此推导双向 Kronecker 和模型的有限样本估计误差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,改进后的界使双向 Kronecker 和模型的有限样本误差得以建立,弥补了 GZH(2019) 中该情形仅有单样本误差、缺乏理论保证的空白;作者还阐述了 Kronecker 和模型并给出全部主要定理的完整证明。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对:所依赖的识别与正则化假设、改进界相对 GZH(2019) 的具体条件差异、log p 因子收紧的推导步骤,以及双向模型有限样本界的确切形式与适用范围。
阅读边界
摘要未说明具体假设、常数、证明细节与模拟或实证结果;本文为 arXiv 预印本,不能据此声称已经同行评审或期刊接收。

原文摘要

Many modern datasets exhibit dependencies among observations as well as variables. A decade ago, Kalaitzis et. al. (2013) proposed the Bigraphical Lasso, an estimator for precision matrices of matrix-normals based on the Cartesian product of graphs; they observed that the associativity of the Kronecker sum yields an approach to the modeling of datasets organized into 3 or higher-order tensors. Subsequently, Greenewald, Zhou and Hero (2019) explored this possibility to a great extent, by introducing the tensor graphical Lasso (TeraLasso) for estimating sparse $L$-way decomposable inverse covariance matrices for all $L \ge 2$, and showing the rates of convergence in the Frobenius and operator norms for estimating this class of inverse covariance matrices for sub-gaussian tensor-valued data. In this paper, we provide sharper rates of convergence for both Bigraphical and TeraLasso estimators for inverse covariance matrices. This improves upon the rates presented in GZH 2019. In particular, (a) we strengthen the bounds for the relative errors in the operator and Frobenius norm by a factor of approximately $\log p$; (b) Crucially, this improvement allows for finite sample estimation errors in both norms to be derived for the two-way Kronecker sum model. This closes the gap between the low single-sample error for the two-way model as observed in GZH 2019 and the lack of theoretical guarantee for this particular case. The two-way regime is important because it is the setting that is the most theoretically challenging, and simultaneously the most common in applications. In the current paper, we elaborate on the Kronecker Sum model, highlight the proof strategy and provide full proofs of all main theorems.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文