Improved estimators of Kullback–Leibler information for autoregressive model selection in small samples
小样本自回归模型选择中 Kullback–Leibler 信息的改进估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究高斯自回归时间序列的阶数选择和信息准则。
小样本自回归模型选择中 Kullback–Leibler 信息的改进估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A new estimator, AICl, of the Kuliback-Leibler information is proposed for Gaussian autoregressive time series model selection. The expected information is decomposed into two terms, the first being estimated without bias. The second term is a penalty function which depends only weakly on the model parameters, and hence can be tabulated by simulation from a white noise process. The estimated information, AICl, is very nearly unbiased when the model is either correct or overfitted. It is shown that the penalty term of AICl, is asymptotically equivalent to that of the AICC criterion of Hurvich & Tsai (1989). For autoregressive models estimated from small samples by Burg's method, simulation provides strong support for the use of the simpler criterion AICC, perhaps using an unbiased version of the first term. If the autoregressive models are estimated by maximum likelihood, then: (a) if none of the candidate model dimensions exceeds one-half the sample size, AICl provides somewhat better model selections than AICc; (b) if some of the candidate models have large dimension, a case considered particularly in engineering applications, then AICl provides much better model selections in small samples than AICC.