Cluster-robust inference with a single treated cluster using the t-test
使用 t 检验进行单一处理簇下的聚类稳健推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将单一处理簇推断联系到双重差分设计,直接支持因果推断分类,但未充分描述具体面板模型。
使用 t 检验进行单一处理簇下的聚类稳健推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This paper considers inference when there is a single treated cluster and a fixed number of control clusters, a setting that is common in empirical work, especially in difference-in-differences designs. We use the t-statistic and develop suitable critical values to conduct valid inference under weak assumptions allowing for unknown dependence within clusters. In particular, our inference procedure does not involve variance estimation. It only requires specifying the relative heterogeneity between the variances from the treated cluster and some, but not necessarily all, control clusters. Our proposed test works for any significance level when there are at least two control clusters. When the variance of the treated cluster is bounded by those of all control clusters up to some prespecified scaling factor, the critical values for our t-statistic can be easily computed without any optimization for many conventional significance levels and numbers of clusters. In other cases, one-dimensional numerical optimization is needed and is often computationally efficient. We have also tabulated common critical values in the paper so researchers can use our test readily. We illustrate our method in simulations and empirical applications.
通过双重随机化推断检验双重差分系数的显著性
This article develops a significance test for the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimator based on dual-margin randomization, in which both the treatment and time indicators are independently permuted to generate an empirical null distribution of the DiD estimator. We situate the proposal explicitly within the landscape of existing inference methods for the DiD estimator, including OLS-based $t$-tests, heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors, cluster-robust variance…
fixest:快速且功能丰富的 R 计量估计框架
fixest is an R package for fast and flexible econometric estimation. It provides a unified framework for applied research, with comprehensive support for a diverse class of models: ordinary least squares, instrumental variables, generalized linear models, maximum likelihood, and difference-in-differences. The package particularly excels at fixed-effects estimation, supported by a novel fixed-point acceleration algorithm implemented in C++. This algorithm achieves rapid…
健康政策与实践中的双重差分:现代方法综述
Difference-in-differences (DiD) is the most popular observational causal inference method in health policy, employed to evaluate the real-world impact of policies and programs. To estimate treatment effects, DiD relies on the "parallel trends assumption", that on average treatment and comparison groups would have had parallel trajectories in the absence of an intervention. Historically, DiD has been considered broadly applicable and straightforward to implement, but recent…
少量处理簇下双重差分的随机化推断
Inference using difference-in-differences with clustered data requires care. Previous research has shown that, when there are few treated clusters, t-tests based on cluster-robust variance estimators (CRVEs) severely overreject, and different variants of the wild cluster bootstrap can either overreject or underreject dramatically. We study two randomization inference (RI) procedures. A procedure based on estimated coefficients may be unreliable when clusters are…
双重差分平均处理效应推断:固定 b 方法
This paper provides an analysis of the standard errors proposed by Driscoll and Kraay (1998) (DK) in linear Difference-in-Differences (DD) models with fixed effects and individual-specific time trends. The analysis is accomplished within the fixed-b asymptotic framework developed by Kiefer and Vogelsang (2005) for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC) covariance matrix estimator based tests. For both the fixed-N, large-T, and large-N, large-T cases, it is…
双重差分回归的标准误
ABSTRACT This paper makes a case for the use of jackknife methods for standard error, value, and confidence interval construction for difference‐in‐difference (DiD) regression. We review cluster‐robust, bootstrap, and jackknife standard error methods and show that standard methods can substantially underperform in conventional settings. In contrast, our proposed jackknife inference methods work well in broad contexts. We illustrate the relevance by replicating several…