Where the Trees Fall: Macroeconomic Forecasts for Forest-Reliant States
树倒何处：依赖森林产业州的宏观经济预测AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要采用向量误差修正模型预测地区行业经济指标，直接涉及时间序列与宏观预测，但未明确使用面板估计。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
树倒何处：依赖森林产业州的宏观经济预测
- 研究问题
- 美国依赖森林产业的州在锯材及纸浆造纸厂关闭背景下，各森林相关行业的就业和企业数量可能如何变化？
- 方法与思路
- 作者以区位商选择六个森林依赖州，用向量误差修正模型预测林业与采伐、木材制造及纸品制造三个行业的经济趋势。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，预测总体显示林业采伐和纸品制造就业及企业数下降，木材制造就业小幅增加，并强调行业与地域差异。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对数据频率、预测期限、协整秩和模型变量，以及样本外预测表现、不确定性区间及各州行业结果的差异。
- 阅读边界
- 这是 arXiv 预印本，同行评审及接收未核实；摘要未说明预测期限或误差，趋势预测不能直接识别工厂关闭或政策的因果效应。
原文摘要
Several key states in various regions of the U.S. have experienced recent sawtimber as well as pulp and paper mill closures, which raises an important policy question: how have and will key macroeconomic and industry specific indicators within the U.S. forest sector likely to change over time? This study provides empirical evidence to support forest-sector policy design by using a vector error correction (VEC) model to forecast economic trends in three major industries - forestry and logging, wood manufacturing, and paper manufacturing - across six of the most forest-dependent states found by the location quotient (LQ) measure: Alabama, Arkansas, Maine, Mississippi, Oregon, and Wisconsin. Overall, the results suggest a general decline in employment and the number of firms in the forestry and logging industry as well as the paper manufacturing industry, while wood manufacturing is projected to see modest employment gains. These results also offer key insights for regional policymakers, industry leaders, and local economic development officials: communities dependent on timber-based manufacturing may be more resilient than other forestry-based industries in the face of economic disruptions. Our findings can help prioritize targeted policy interventions and inform regional economic resilience strategies. We show distinct differences across forest-dependent industries and/or state sectors and geographies, highlighting that policies may have to be specific to each sector and/or geographical area. Finally, our VEC modeling framework is adaptable to other resource-dependent industries that serve as regional economic pillars such as mining, agriculture, and energy production offering a transferable tool for policy analysis in regions with similar economic structures.