跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用结构均值模型与 G 估计研究纵向行为的因果效应和决策规则。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Erica E. M. Moodie
Robert W. Platt
Michael S. Kramer

估计最大化结局的决策规则:母乳喂养应用

研究问题
如何把持续母乳喂养视为纵向决策序列,估计最大化婴儿一岁时体重或身长的规则,并与短期优化比较?
方法与思路
作者在 PROBIT 干预试验背景下使用结构均值模型与 G 估计,并实施一种修改后的 G 估计算法估计决策规则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称这是修改算法的首次真实数据应用,并展示短期最优决策与优化长期结局的决策可能不同。
阅读关注点
应核对喂养行为效应的识别条件、两种 G 估计算法的区别、优化标准,以及摘要所提示的文章更正内容。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,且提示另有更正但未提供内容。随机化对象是促进喂养的干预,最优体重或身长不等于整体健康最优。

原文摘要

To estimate the sequence of actions that optimizes response in a longitudinal setting, it is important to study the actions as part of a set of decision rules rather than in a series of single-action comparisons. We take as our motivating example the estimation of the set of decision rules for the duration of breastfeeding with a view to maximizing infant growth. Breastfeeding has many well-recognized beneficial effects on health and development. However observational evidence has suggested that breastfeeding is associated with reduced infant growth, although the long-term consequences for stature and adiposity remain controversial. The Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) recruited 17,046 women in which hospitals and their affiliated polyclinics in Belarus were randomized to a breastfeeding promotion intervention or to standard care. In this article, we propose Structural Mean Models and estimate their parameters using G-estimation to obtain unbiased estimates of the effect of continued breastfeeding on infant growth (weight or length) at one year of age. We also implement a modified version of the G-estimation algorithm that is asymptotically unbiased; this is the first real-data application of the algorithm. Finally, we compare the decision rules implied by the G-estimates with the decision implied by a myopic optimization estimation approach, that is, we compare with decision rules that maximize response in the short-term. The breastfeeding regimes selected by each of the three models are optimal in the sense that specific criteria were optimized; the criteria considered here (maximizing weight or length) were chosen for simplicity, but may not lead to better overall health. We demonstrate in the context of a breastfeeding promotion intervention trial that optimal myopic decision strategies do not coincide with strategies that optimize a longer-term response. Please see the online supplements for a correction to this article.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文