跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用非参数回归与重尾统计理论,未明确对应所列经济计量细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Qiyang Han
Jon A. Wellner

重尾误差下最小二乘回归估计量的收敛速度

研究问题
在误差与协变量独立、误差仅具有有限阶矩的非参数回归中,最小二乘估计的收敛速度如何受尾部厚度与模型复杂度影响?
方法与思路
作者结合带指数的熵条件与误差矩条件,利用新的乘子经验过程不等式分析最小二乘损失,并讨论稀疏线性回归应用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称所得速度在仅有熵条件时不可改善,并刻画达到高斯误差速度的矩门槛;失去独立性时收敛可能任意缓慢。
阅读关注点
应核对熵条件与损失的精确定义、速度下界的模型构造,以及误差独立性如何进入证明和稀疏回归应用。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要,不能核验完整正则条件、下界证明或稳健估计量比较范围,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

We study the performance of the least squares estimator (LSE) in a general nonparametric regression model, when the errors are independent of the covariates but may only have a $p$th moment ($p\geq1$). In such a heavy-tailed regression setting, we show that if the model satisfies a standard “entropy condition” with exponent $\alpha\in(0,2)$, then the $L_{2}$ loss of the LSE converges at a rate \[\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}}\bigl(n^{-\frac{1}{2+\alpha}}\vee n^{-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2p}}\bigr).\] Such a rate cannot be improved under the entropy condition alone. This rate quantifies both some positive and negative aspects of the LSE in a heavy-tailed regression setting. On the positive side, as long as the errors have $p\geq1+2/\alpha$ moments, the $L_{2}$ loss of the LSE converges at the same rate as if the errors are Gaussian. On the negative side, if $p<1+2/\alpha$, there are (many) hard models at any entropy level $\alpha$ for which the $L_{2}$ loss of the LSE converges at a strictly slower rate than other robust estimators. The validity of the above rate relies crucially on the independence of the covariates and the errors. In fact, the $L_{2}$ loss of the LSE can converge arbitrarily slowly when the independence fails. The key technical ingredient is a new multiplier inequality that gives sharp bounds for the “multiplier empirical process” associated with the LSE. We further give an application to the sparse linear regression model with heavy-tailed covariates and errors to demonstrate the scope of this new inequality.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文