跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般联立方程检验的有限样本理论,未提供足够依据对应所列应用细分领域,因此暂不分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
George F. Rhodes

似然比识别检验统计量的精确密度与近似临界域

研究问题
在线性方程包含任意数量内生与外生变量时,过度识别限制的似然比检验具有怎样的有限样本分布,如何构造临界域?
方法与思路
作者推导过度识别限制似然比统计量的精确有限样本密度,讨论密度与检验的性质,并提出新的临界域近似。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出一般变量数量下的精确有限样本密度及其推导,并提出和研究新的近似临界域,扩展此前较特殊的结果。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对过度识别限制的具体原假设、精确密度所需分布假设,以及近似临界域的适用范围与检验尺寸。
阅读边界
摘要未给出新近似的误差界、具体临界值或有限样本拒绝率,也未列明全部分布条件,不能据此判断其校准精度。

原文摘要

The exact finite-sample density function of the likelihood ratio (LR) test of overidentifying restrictions in linear equations with any number of included endogenous and exogenous variables is presented, along with its derivation. Properties of the density function and the LR test are presented and discussed. A new approximation for the LR test critical region is proposed and studied. 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY THE CRITICAL NATURE of identification in simultaneous equation models is well recognized. The identification status of equations within a simultaneous equation system helps determine which estimator to use and dictates some properties of the alternative estimators. It represents a statistical hypothesis that is logically prior to many other standard estimation and testing procedures carried out for model construction and evaluation. The major purposes of this paper are (i) analytical exploration of the likelihood ratio identifiability test statistic for equations with any number of endogenous and exogenous variables and (ii) proposal of a new approximate critical region for testing overidentifying restrictions in such equations. Anderson and Rubin [2] proposed a likelihood ratio test of overidentifying restrictions imposed on the structural parameter space along with their derivation of LIML estimates. Basmann [5] proposed a similar statistic based on the GCL estimation method. McDonald [20] derived the exact finite sample density function for the LR test statistic for an equation containing exactly two endogenous variables. Richardson [26] derived the finite sample density function for the two endogenous variable GCL version of the identifiability test statistic. Both McDonald and Richardson showed that the moments of the exact functions converge to moments of the F distribution as the concentration parameter increases without bound. Each gave necessary conditions for existence of exact moments. McDonald showed that the GCL test statistic will not possess more moments than the LIML statistic in the two-equation case. In further analysis, Kadane [13, 14] showed that both tests are consistent and that both the LR and GCL identifiability test statistics converge to the F distribution as the structural disturbances grow small. Some parallel developments have occurred in multivariate statistical analysis. These are not reviewed here because they are mainly tangential or else are cited at appropriate places in this paper.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文