跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦缺失数据与插补推断,经济普查应用本身不足以归入所列因果或其他细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
R. Wang
J. Sedransk
J. H. Jinn

存在缺失观测时的二次数据分析

研究问题
在缺失不能视为随机缺失时,把插补值当作观测值或仅分析已观测数据,会如何影响简单线性回归系数的置信区间?
方法与思路
作者比较一般插补与多重插补下的分析方式,利用加权分布求统计量矩的可计算界,并提出参数化响应概率函数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,研究提供统计量矩的上下界,以经济普查数据检验响应概率函数,并总结对插补提供机构和二次分析者的建议。
阅读关注点
应核对非随机缺失机制的设定、插补与分析模型是否匹配、加权分布的构造,以及置信区间性能如何衡量。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体覆盖率、插补规则和建议内容未说明,普查应用不能证明普遍有效,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

A data set having missing observations often is completed by using imputed values. Our objective is to improve the practice of secondary data analysis by looking at the interplay of different imputation techniques and different methods that secondary data analysts use when there are both observed and imputed values. Secondary data analysts typically either treat the completed data set as if it has only observed values or ignore the imputations and analyze only the observed values. The first objective of our research is to investigate the effect on the properties of standard statistical techniques of proceeding in these ways. We assume that the missing data cannot be regarded as missing at random (MAR), and that the secondary data analyst's objectives are confidence intervals for the regression coefficients in a simple linear regression. Standard, “general purpose” imputation methods are emphasized. The second objective is to investigate the performance of confidence intervals based on multiple imputations. Obtaining moments of statistics requires averaging using a weighted distribution. Because analytical results typically cannot be obtained, we show how to obtain lower and upper bounds that can be computed easily. We also present a simple parametric function for the probability of response given variables of interest, and validate it using data from the 1987 Economic Censuses. We also summarize our findings and make recommendations to the organizations providing the imputations. Finally, we delineate the options available to secondary data analysts.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文