跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用条件独立检验并应用于生物标志物筛选,未提供因果识别设计或其他所列经济领域的明确依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Molei Liu
Eugene Katsevich
Lucas Janson
Aaditya Ramdas

通过蒸馏实现快速且有力的条件随机化检验

研究问题
条件随机化检验使用复杂预测算法时需要反复重算,如何降低这一计算负担,同时保留条件独立检验的有效性和功效?
方法与思路
作者提出蒸馏式条件随机化检验,减少机器学习算法的重复运行,并结合筛选与计算复用,利用协变量条件分布信息开展检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,组合方法在模拟中达到与有力的已有实现相近的功效,同时显著减少计算,并通过乳腺癌数据展示生物标志物筛选。
阅读关注点
应核对协变量条件分布如何获得、蒸馏统计量的构造,以及筛选和复用保持精确有效性的条件;比较计算量时需检查基准设置。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断条件分布估计误差的影响或具体加速幅度;条件独立检验结果不能直接解释为因果关系。

原文摘要

Summary We consider the problem of conditional independence testing: given a response $Y$ and covariates $(X,Z)$, we test the null hypothesis that $Y {\perp\!\!\!\perp} X \mid Z$. The conditional randomization test was recently proposed as a way to use distributional information about $X\mid Z$ to exactly and nonasymptotically control Type-I error using any test statistic in any dimensionality without assuming anything about $Y\mid (X,Z)$. This flexibility, in principle, allows one to derive powerful test statistics from complex prediction algorithms while maintaining statistical validity. Yet the direct use of such advanced test statistics in the conditional randomization test is prohibitively computationally expensive, especially with multiple testing, due to the requirement to recompute the test statistic many times on resampled data. We propose the distilled conditional randomization test, a novel approach to using state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms in the conditional randomization test while drastically reducing the number of times those algorithms need to be run, thereby taking advantage of their power and the conditional randomization test’s statistical guarantees without suffering the usual computational expense. In addition to distillation, we propose a number of other tricks, like screening and recycling computations, to further speed up the conditional randomization test without sacrificing its high power and exact validity. Indeed, we show in simulations that all our proposals combined lead to a test that has similar power to most powerful existing conditional randomization test implementations, but requires orders of magnitude less computation, making it a practical tool even for large datasets. We demonstrate these benefits on a breast cancer dataset by identifying biomarkers related to cancer stage.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文