跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕随机分配下平均处理效应检验及协变量调整,直接属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Anqi Zhao
Peng Ding

针对平均处理效应的协变量调整 Fisher 随机化检验

研究问题
协变量调整后的 Fisher 随机化检验,能否同时有效检验所有个体无效应的强零假设与平均处理效应为零的弱零假设?
方法与思路
作者比较残差伪结果与模型输出两类调整策略,推荐含处理、中心化协变量及交互项的 OLS,并以处理项稳健 t 值检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,推荐程序对强零假设有限样本精确、对弱零假设渐近有效,且具有功效增益;理论还扩展至多种随机化设计。
阅读关注点
应核对不同随机化设计对应的统计量、稳健方差构造、弱零假设下的渐近条件,以及功效比较成立的范围与基准。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,不能将完全随机化下的推荐直接照搬到所有设计;模型误设稳健性的条件与模拟数值未说明。

原文摘要

Fisher’s randomization test (frt) delivers exact p-values under the strong null hypothesis of no treatment effect on any units whatsoever and allows for flexible covariate adjustment to improve the power. Of interest is whether the resulting covariate-adjusted procedure could also be valid for testing the weak null hypothesis of zero average treatment effect. To this end, we evaluate two general strategies for conducting covariate adjustment in frts: the pseudo-outcome strategy that uses the residuals from an outcome model with only the covariates as the pseudo, covariate-adjusted outcomes to form the test statistic, and the model-output strategy that directly uses the output from an outcome model with both the treatment and covariates as the covariate-adjusted test statistic. Based on theory and simulation, we recommend using the ordinary least squares (ols) fit of the observed outcome on the treatment, centered covariates, and their interactions for covariate adjustment, and conducting frt with the robust t-value of the treatment as the test statistic. The resulting frt is finite-sample exact for testing the strong null hypothesis, asymptotically valid for testing the weak null hypothesis, and more powerful than the unadjusted counterpart under alternatives, all irrespective of whether the linear model is correctly specified or not. We start with complete randomization, and then extend the theory to cluster randomization, stratified randomization, and rerandomization, respectively, giving a recommendation for the test procedure and test statistic under each design. Our theory is design-based, also known as randomization-based, in which we condition on the potential outcomes but average over the random treatment assignment.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文