Stable Decision Problems
稳定决策问题AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般贝叶斯决策、损失扰动与稳健性,估计和预测均未限定经济应用,缺乏所列细分方向的直接依据。
稳定决策问题AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A decision problem is characterized by a loss function $V$ and opinion $H$. The pair $(V, H)$ is said to be strongly stable iff for every sequence $F_n \rightarrow_\omega H, G_n \rightarrow_\omega H$ and $L_n\rightarrow V, W_n\rightarrow V$ uniformly, $\lim_{\varepsilon \downarrow 0} \lim \sup_{n\rightarrow \infty} \lbrack \int L_n(\theta, D_n(\varepsilon)) dF_n(\theta) - \inf_D \int L_n(\theta, D) dF_n(\theta)\rbrack = 0$ for every sequence $D_n(\varepsilon)$ satisfying $\int W_n(\theta, D_n(\varepsilon)) dG_n(\theta) \leqq \inf_D \int W_n(\theta, D) dG_n(\theta) + \varepsilon.$ We show that squared error loss is unstable with any opinion if the parameter space is the real line and that any bounded loss function $V(\theta, D)$ that is continuous in $\theta$ uniformly in $D$ is stable with any opinion $H$. Finally we examine the estimation or prediction case $V(\theta, D) = h(\theta - D)$, where $h$ is continuous, nondecreasing in $(0, \infty)$ and nonincreasing in $(-\infty, 0)$ and has bounded growth. While these conditions are not enough to assure strong stability, various conditions are given that are sufficient. We believe that stability offers the beginning of a Bayesian theory of robustness.