跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究长度偏倚和右删失下的生存函数估计,未涉及经济分布效应或其他所列细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Masoud Asgharian
David B. Wolfson

右删失现患队列中长度偏倚生存函数无条件非参数最大似然估计的渐近行为

研究问题
在发病率恒定、具有随访与右删失的现患队列中,长度偏倚生存函数的无条件非参数最大似然估计有哪些渐近性质?
方法与思路
作者利用恒定发病率结构开展无条件推断,推导长度偏倚生存函数估计的渐近性质,并联系新发病例的生存函数估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该估计具有一致强收敛、向高斯过程的弱收敛及渐近效率,且结果可导出新发病例生存函数估计的渐近性质。
阅读关注点
应核对恒定发病率与删失机制的形式条件、似然及估计对象、弱收敛所用空间,以及效率比较的参照框架。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;完整抽样与删失条件未说明,无条件推断的效率结论不能推广至任意现患队列。

原文摘要

Right censored survival data collected on a cohort of prevalent cases with constant incidence are length-biased, and may be used to estimate the length-biased (i.e., prevalent-case) survival function. When the incidence rate is constant, so-called stationarity of the incidence, it is more efficient to use this structure for unconditional statistical inference than to carry out an analysis by conditioning on the observed truncation times. It is well known that, due to the informative censoring for prevalent cohort data, the Kaplan–Meier estimator is not the unconditional NPMLE of the length-biased survival function and the asymptotic properties of the NPMLE do not follow from any known result. We present here a detailed derivation of the asymptotic properties of the NPMLE of the length-biased survival function from right censored prevalent cohort survival data with follow-up. In particular, we show that the NPMLE is uniformly strongly consistent, converges weakly to a Gaussian process, and is asymptotically efficient. One important spin-off from these results is that they yield the asymptotic properties of the NPMLE of the incident-case survival function [see Asgharian, M’Lan and Wolfson J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97 (2002) 201–209], which is often of prime interest in a prevalent cohort study. Our results generalize those given by Vardi and Zhang [Ann. Statist. 20 (1992) 1022–1039] under multiplicative censoring, which we show arises as a degenerate case in a prevalent cohort setting.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文