跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用选择性预测区间,未提供宏观预测、收益预测或其他所列细分方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yajie Bao
Yuyang Huo
Haojie Ren
Changliang Zou

控制错误覆盖声明率的选择性保形推断

研究问题
当只为未标记测试集中经过筛选的个体报告预测区间时,如何处理选择与多重报告带来的覆盖问题,并控制错误覆盖声明率?
方法与思路
作者在分割保形框架下对校准集和测试集都实施筛选,利用筛选后校准样本的条件经验分布构造选择性预测区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称可交换选择规则下可精确控制错误覆盖声明率,非可交换情形则给出非渐近界;数值实验报告区间长度改善。
阅读关注点
应核对错误覆盖声明率的定义、选择规则与数据可交换性的条件,以及校准集参与非可交换筛选时额外分布假设的作用。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断完整可交换性条件或非渐近界的紧致程度;总体错误覆盖控制不等同于每个个体的条件覆盖保证。

原文摘要

SUMMARY Conformal inference is a popular tool for constructing prediction intervals. We consider here the scenario of post-selection/selective conformal inference, that is, prediction intervals are reported only for individuals selected from unlabelled test data. To account for multiplicity, we develop a general split conformal framework to construct selective prediction intervals with the false coverage-statement rate control. We first investigate the false coverage rate–adjusted method of Benjamini & Yekutieli (2005) in the present setting, and show that it is able to achieve false coverage-statement rate control, but yields uniformly inflated prediction intervals. We then propose a novel solution to the problem called selective conditional conformal prediction. Our method performs selection procedures on both the calibration set and test set, and then constructs conformal prediction intervals for the selected test candidates with the aid of the conditional empirical distribution obtained by the post-selection calibration set. When the selection rule is exchangeable, we show that our proposed method can exactly control the false coverage-statement rate in a model-free and distribution-free guarantee. For nonexchangeable selection procedures involving the calibration set, we provide non-asymptotic bounds for the false coverage-statement rate under mild distributional assumptions. Numerical results confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our method under false coverage-statement rate control and show that it achieves more narrowed prediction intervals over existing methods across various settings.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文