跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕符号限制结构 VAR、脉冲响应及货币与石油冲击展开,直接对应 VAR 与冲击分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Atsushi Inoue
Lutz Kilian

结构 VAR 模型中脉冲响应函数的推断

研究问题
在符号限制识别的结构 VAR 中,如何概括最可能的可容许脉冲响应,并刻画整组响应的联合不确定性?
方法与思路
作者利用可容许模型联合后验分布的众数寻找最可能响应,并构造最高后验密度可信集用于联合推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称逐点后验中位数无法刻画结构响应的中心位置,所提方法适用于完全和部分识别,并提供联合可信集。
阅读关注点
应核对逐点中位数失效的原因、联合后验众数的定义与计算,以及可信集在不同识别情形下的解释。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,先验、符号限制与计算细节均未说明;货币和石油冲击案例不能据此推广到其他设定。

原文摘要

Skepticism toward traditional identifying assumptions based on exclusion restrictions has led to a surge in the use of structural VAR models in which structural shocks are identified by restricting the sign of the responses of selected macroeconomic aggregates to these shocks. Researchers commonly report the vector of pointwise posterior medians of the impulse responses as a measure of central tendency of the estimated response functions, along with pointwise 68% posterior error bands. It can be shown that this approach cannot be used to characterize the central tendency of the structural impulse response functions. We propose an alternative method of summarizing the evidence from sign-identified VAR models designed to enhance their practical usefulness. Our objective is to characterize the most likely admissible model(s) within the set of structural VAR models that satisfy the sign restrictions. We show how the set of most likely structural response functions can be computed from the posterior mode of the joint distribution of admissible models both in the fully identified and in the partially identified case, and we propose a highest-posterior density credible set that characterizes the joint uncertainty about this set. Our approach can also be used to resolve the long-standing problem of how to conduct joint inference on sets of structural impulse response functions in exactly identified VAR models. We illustrate the differences between our approach and the traditional approach for the analysis of the effects of monetary policy shocks and of the effects of oil demand and oil supply shocks.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文