跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究内生删失面板模型,并明确将推断用于与处理效应模型相联系的实证应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shakeeb Khan
Maria Ponomareva
Elie Tamer

内生删失面板数据模型的识别

研究问题
当结果变量的删失可任意依赖可观测与不可观测变量时,如何刻画线性面板模型的识别集,并构造有效的参数置信集合?
方法与思路
作者分别在扰动平稳性和非平稳下的条件独立限制中刻画尖锐识别集,通过反演随机占优检验推断,并讨论动态扩展与点识别。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,识别集刻画具有尖锐性,推断程序给出有效置信集合,并扩展至滞后结果、滞后指示变量及因子载荷模型。
阅读关注点
应分别核对两组假设、尖锐性证明和支持条件,并查看动态项、因子载荷与删失机制如何进入识别及处理效应应用。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要;一般结论是集合识别,点识别另需支持条件。摘要未提供条件细节、集合大小或置信集合的数值表现。

原文摘要

We study inference on parameters in linear panel data models when outcomes are censored. We allow the censoring to depend on both observable and unobservable variables in arbitrary ways. Generally, these models are set identified and the main contribution of this paper is to derive and characterize the identified sets under general conditions. Our main characterization theorems show that every parameter in the sharp set–and only those parameters–can generate the observed data under the maintained assumptions. In particular, we consider two separate sets of assumptions (2 models): the first uses stationarity on the unobserved disturbance terms. The second is a nonstationary model with a conditional independence restriction. Based on the characterizations of the identified sets, we provide an inference procedure that is shown to yield valid confidence sets based on inverting stochastic dominance tests. We also show how our results extend to empirically interesting dynamic versions of the model with both lagged observed outcomes, lagged indicators, and models with factor loads. In addition, we provide sufficient conditions for point identification in terms of support conditions. The paper then examines the size of the identified sets in particular designs, and a Monte Carlo exercise shows reasonable small sample performance of our procedures. We also apply our inference approach to two empirical illustrations that link endogenous censoring to treatment effects models.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文