跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究随历史信息调整的治疗决策及方案价值,直接对应动态干预与因果决策问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chengchun Shi
Ailin Fan
Rui Song
Wenbin Lu

最优动态治疗方案的高维A-learning

研究问题
当候选协变量数量达到样本量的非多项式量级时,如何筛选治疗决策变量并估计多阶段最优动态治疗方案,同时保持双重稳健性?
方法与思路
作者提出惩罚化多阶段A-learning,使用Dantzig选择器直接惩罚估计方程,以保留双重稳健性质,并进行模拟及STAR*D数据应用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立了治疗方案参数估计的预言机不等式,以及估计方案与真实最优方案之间的价值函数误差界,提供高维决策的理论支持。
阅读关注点
应核对动态治疗的识别条件、双重稳健性要求哪些模型正确,以及高维稀疏条件、惩罚选择和价值函数误差界的具体形式。
阅读边界
仅依据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未给出识别和正则条件,也未报告应用效果,不能据此断言方案具有临床优势。

原文摘要

Precision medicine is a medical paradigm that focuses on finding the most effective treatment decision based on individual patient information. For many complex diseases, such as cancer, treatment decisions need to be tailored over time according to patients' responses to previous treatments. Such an adaptive strategy is referred as a dynamic treatment regime. A major challenge in deriving an optimal dynamic treatment regime arises when an extraordinary large number of prognostic factors, such as patient's genetic information, demographic characteristics, medical history and clinical measurements over time are available, but not all of them are necessary for making treatment decision. This makes variable selection an emerging need in precision medicine. In this paper, we propose a penalized multi-stage A-learning for deriving the optimal dynamic treatment regime when the number of covariates is of the non-polynomial (NP) order of the sample size. To preserve the double robustness property of the A-learning method, we adopt the Dantzig selector which directly penalizes the A-leaning estimating equations. Oracle inequalities of the proposed estimators for the parameters in the optimal dynamic treatment regime and error bounds on the difference between the value functions of the estimated optimal dynamic treatment regime and the true optimal dynamic treatment regime are established. Empirical performance of the proposed approach is evaluated by simulations and illustrated with an application to data from the STAR*D study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文