Incremental effects for continuous exposures
连续暴露的增量干预效应AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究连续处理的随机干预、因果效应识别及剂量反应估计。
连续暴露的增量干预效应AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Causal inference problems often involve continuous treatments, such as dose, duration, or frequency. However, identifying and estimating standard dose-response estimands requires that everyone has some chance of receiving any level of the exposure (i.e., positivity). To avoid this assumption, we consider stochastic interventions based on exponentially tilting the treatment distribution by some parameter $δ$ (an incremental effect); this increases or decreases the likelihood a unit receives a given treatment level. We derive the efficient influence function and semiparametric efficiency bound for these incremental effects under continuous exposures. We then show estimation depends on the size of the tilt, as measured by $δ$. In particular, we derive new minimax lower bounds illustrating how the best possible root mean squared error scales with an effective sample size of $n / δ$, instead of $n$. Further, we establish new convergence rates and bounds on the bias of double machine learning-style estimators. Our novel analysis gives a better dependence on $δ$ compared to standard analyses by using mixed supremum and $L_2$ norms. Finally, we define a "reflected" exponential tilt around any interior point and show that taking $δ\to \infty$ yields a new estimator of the dose-response curve across the treatment support.