On cross-validated Lasso in high dimensions
高维交叉验证Lasso的理论分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要是高维回归与调参的通用理论,未明确涉及宏观预测、收益预测或其他所列领域。
高维交叉验证Lasso的理论分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this paper, we derive nonasymptotic error bounds for the Lasso estimator when the penalty parameter for the estimator is chosen using K-fold cross-validation. Our bounds imply that the cross-validated Lasso estimator has nearly optimal rates of convergence in the prediction, L2, and L1 norms. For example, we show that in the model with the Gaussian noise and under fairly general assumptions on the candidate set of values of the penalty parameter, the estimation error of the cross-validated Lasso estimator converges to zero in the prediction norm with the slogp/n×log(pn) rate, where n is the sample size of available data, p is the number of covariates and s is the number of nonzero coefficients in the model. Thus, the cross-validated Lasso estimator achieves the fastest possible rate of convergence in the prediction norm up to a small logarithmic factor log(pn), and similar conclusions apply for the convergence rate both in L2 and in L1 norms. Importantly, our results cover the case when p is (potentially much) larger than n and also allow for the case of non-Gaussian noise. Our paper therefore serves as a justification for the widely spread practice of using cross-validation as a method to choose the penalty parameter for the Lasso estimator.