Rational expectations, inflation and the nominal interest rate
理性预期、通货膨胀与名义利率AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本直接讨论债券市场价格的信息含义,以及利用利率和收益率曲线预测通胀。
理性预期、通货膨胀与名义利率AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
There is a substantial empirical literature, beginning with Fama (1975), that utilizes regressions of the inflation rate in a given period on initial interest rates (or inflation differentials on the slope of the initial yield curve) to test the Fisher hypothesis and/or to provide forecasts of inflation. Both uses depend critically on the maintained hypothesis that asset market prices fully incorporate all relevant current information about future yields. This paper will investigate the plausibility of the rational expectations hypothesis for real returns in markets for one-period default-free bonds, will show that under normal macroeconomic assumptions it cannot be expected to hold, and will consider the consequences of its failure for the interpretation of empirical results.