跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦队列抽样设计下的统计推断,逆概率加权本身不足以支持因果推断等细分分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Tianxi Cai
Yingye Zheng

嵌套病例对照研究中的推断重抽样程序

研究问题
嵌套病例对照设计中,重复有限风险集抽样引入复杂相关性时,如何为逆概率加权估计及函数的同时推断提供有效校准?
方法与思路
作者针对风险集重复抽样造成的相关结构提出重抽样程序,以估计一大类逆概率加权估计量的分布并支持区间推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,程序在解析方差难以推导或表现欠佳的模拟情境中表现良好,并以队列数据展示个体心血管风险分析。
阅读关注点
应核对重抽样如何保留抽样相关性、允许的加权估计量类别,以及非光滑目标和函数同时推断各自需要的条件。
阅读边界
摘要未给出程序细节、有效性条件或覆盖率数值。所据为版本未注明的索引摘要,不能据此判断刊本变化。

原文摘要

The nested case-control (NCC) design have been widely adopted as a cost-effective solution in many large cohort studies for risk assessment with expensive markers, such as the emerging biologic and genetic markers. To analyze data from NCC studies, conditional logistic regression (Goldstein and Langholz, 1992; Borgan et al., 1995) and maximum likelihood (Scheike and Juul, 2004; Zeng et al., 2006) based methods have been proposed. However, most of these methods either cannot be easily extended beyond the Cox model (Cox, 1972) or require additional modeling assumptions. More generally applicable approaches based on inverse probability weighting (IPW) have been proposed as useful alternatives (Samuelsen, 1997; Chen, 2001; Samuelsen et al., 2007). However, due to the complex correlation structure induced by repeated finite risk set sampling, interval estimation for such IPW estimators remain challenging especially when the estimation involves non-smooth objective functions or when making simultaneous inferences about functions. Standard resampling procedures such as the bootstrap cannot accommodate the correlation and thus are not directly applicable. In this paper, we propose a resampling procedure that can provide valid estimates for the distribution of a broad class of IPW estimators. Simulation results suggest that the proposed procedures perform well in settings when analytical variance estimator is infeasible to derive or gives less optimal performance. The new procedures are illustrated with data from the Framingham Offspring Study to characterize individual level cardiovascular risks over time based on the Framingham risk score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and a genetic risk score.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文