跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用参数的预测辅助推断,并未明确针对因果效应、宏观预测或金融收益预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wenlong Ji
Lihua Lei
Tijana Zrnic

将预测作为替代结果:人工智能时代重新审视替代结局

研究问题
当真实结局昂贵且仅部分可观测时,如何把预训练模型预测作为廉价替代信息,用于提高目标参数统计推断的效率?
方法与思路
作者连接替代结局模型与预测辅助推断,使用灵活机器学习重新校准并学习最优插补损失,再据此构造参数估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,重校准具有相对仅用真实结局样本的效率改善保证,一致学习时达类内最小渐近方差,并保持凸损失下的凸优化。
阅读关注点
应核对标签可观测机制、效率比较的条件及估计量类别、插补损失学习的误差要求,以及三个应用中的有效样本量定义。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;摘要未列出抽样和学习条件或数值增益,其效率保证不能直接解释为所有样本规模下都更准确。

原文摘要

Abstract We establish a formal connection between the decades-old surrogate outcome model in biostatistics and economics and the emerging field of prediction-powered inference. The connection treats predictions from pre-trained models, prevalent in the age of AI, as cost-effective surrogates for expensive outcomes that are not fully observed. Building on the surrogate outcomes literature, we develop recalibrated prediction-powered inference, a more efficient approach to statistical inference than existing prediction-powered inference proposals. Our method departs from the existing proposals by using flexible machine learning techniques to learn the optimal “imputed loss” through a step we call recalibration. Importantly, the method always improves upon the estimator that relies solely on the data with available true outcomes, even when the optimal imputed loss is estimated imperfectly, and it achieves the smallest asymptotic variance among prediction-powered inference estimators if the estimate is consistent. Computationally, our optimization objective is convex whenever the loss function that defines the target parameter is convex. We further analyze the benefits of recalibration, both theoretically and numerically, in several common scenarios where machine learning predictions systematically deviate from the outcome of interest. We demonstrate significant gains in effective sample size over exist-ing prediction-powered inference proposals via three applications leveraging state-of-the-art AI models.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文