跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用检验反演和置信集合构造,未限定于任何所列经济计量方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Erik Bolviken
Eva Skovlund

从蒙特卡洛检验构造置信区间

研究问题
如何通过反演蒙特卡洛检验获得具有准确置信水平且便于计算的置信集合,并区分模拟误差与样本数据带来的不确定性?
方法与思路
作者在单参数情形下利用统计量对参数几乎处处单调的随机表示,固定随机抽取并改变参数,以模拟分位点匹配观测统计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出一般保守近似和若干单参数精确方法,并建立比较模拟与数据不确定性的理论,讨论指数族等多类模型。
阅读关注点
应核对随机表示的单调条件、模拟抽样与区间端点构造,以及精确置信水平的含义和干扰参数对方法适用性的限制。
阅读边界
材料是版本未注明的索引摘要;作者明确指出存在干扰参数时通常难得精确结果,不能将单参数保证推广到一般模型。

原文摘要

It is argued that confidence sets can be derived from Monte Carlo tests by exploiting the equivalence between confidence estimation and hypothesis testing.The approach benefits from the wide applicability of this class of tests and the high level accuracy that is passed on to the confidence sets.The main problem is whether the confidence sets are simple enough to be of practical interest.A conservative general approximation is given, but most of the paper deals with exact methods in one-parameter situations.We work with statistics that allow stochastic representations that are almost surely monotone in terms of the parameter of interest.Simulated samples can then be adjusted by varying the parameter and keeping random drawings fixed.By making some selected fractile of such Monte Carlo samples equal to the observed statistic, a critical point with exact confidence level can be determined.A simple theory to compare the Monte Carlo uncertainty to the uncertainty contributed by the data is developed.The main application is to models belonging to the one-parameter exponential class.Other examples considered are locationand scale models, the correlation coefficient, the size parameter in hypergeometric experiments, binomials and rank statistics.The choice of sampling technique is delicate and strongly problem dependent.Exact results, with the exception of pure location-scale models, are rarely possible when there are nuisance parameters, but it is hoped that the basic approach may turn out to be a way to obtain accurate, approximate results under many circumstances.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文