Testing specification of distribution in stochastic frontier analysis
随机前沿分析中无效率分布设定的检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将方法扩展至面板设定,并使用银行面板数据检验无效率分布。
随机前沿分析中无效率分布设定的检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Stochastic frontier analysis is regularly used in empirical studies to evaluate the productivity and efficiency of companies. A typical stochastic frontier model involves a parametric frontier subject to a composite error term consisting of an inefficiency and a random error. We develop new tests for specification of distribution of the inefficiency. We focus on simultaneous relaxation of two common assumptions: (1) parametric frontier which may lead to false conclusions when misspecified, and (2) homoscedasticity which can be easily violated when working with real data. While these two issues have been extensively studied in prior research exploring the estimation of a stochastic frontier and inefficiencies, they have not been properly addressed in the considered testing problem. We propose novel bootstrap and asymptotic distribution-free tests with neither parametric frontier nor homoscedasticity assumptions, in both cross-sectional and panel settings. Our tests are asymptotically consistent, simple to implement and widely applicable. Their powers against general fixed alternatives tend to one as sample size increases, and they can detect root-n order local alternatives. We demonstrate their efficacies through extensive simulation studies. When applied to a banking panel dataset, our tests provide sound justification for the commonly used exponential specification for banking data. The findings also show that a new parametric frontier model is more plausible than the conventional translog frontier.