跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将方法扩展至面板设定,并使用银行面板数据检验无效率分布。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ming-Yen Cheng
Shouxia Wang
Lucy Xia
Xibin Zhang

随机前沿分析中无效率分布设定的检验

研究问题
在前沿函数可能误设且误差存在异方差时,如何检验随机前沿模型中的无效率分布,并适用于截面与面板数据?
方法与思路
作者同时放松参数化前沿与同方差要求,构建自助检验和渐近分布无关检验,并通过模拟及银行面板数据进行展示。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,检验具有渐近一致性并能检测根号样本量阶的局部备择;银行应用支持指数分布及一种新的参数化前沿。
阅读关注点
应核对复合误差各部分的分布与依赖限制、非参数前沿的估计方式、面板相关处理,以及局部备择的具体定义。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要;仍需满足的条件与银行检验数值未说明,支持指数设定不能理解为证明该分布真实。

原文摘要

Stochastic frontier analysis is regularly used in empirical studies to evaluate the productivity and efficiency of companies. A typical stochastic frontier model involves a parametric frontier subject to a composite error term consisting of an inefficiency and a random error. We develop new tests for specification of distribution of the inefficiency. We focus on simultaneous relaxation of two common assumptions: (1) parametric frontier which may lead to false conclusions when misspecified, and (2) homoscedasticity which can be easily violated when working with real data. While these two issues have been extensively studied in prior research exploring the estimation of a stochastic frontier and inefficiencies, they have not been properly addressed in the considered testing problem. We propose novel bootstrap and asymptotic distribution-free tests with neither parametric frontier nor homoscedasticity assumptions, in both cross-sectional and panel settings. Our tests are asymptotically consistent, simple to implement and widely applicable. Their powers against general fixed alternatives tend to one as sample size increases, and they can detect root-n order local alternatives. We demonstrate their efficacies through extensive simulation studies. When applied to a banking panel dataset, our tests provide sound justification for the commonly used exponential specification for banking data. The findings also show that a new parametric frontier model is more plausible than the conventional translog frontier.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文