跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确关注试验中的总体治疗效应及分层因素调整,直接对应因果效应分析方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zihan Qian
Lu Tian
Miki Horiguchi
Hajime Uno

基于生存加权平均风险率的总体治疗效应分层分析

研究问题
对时间至事件结局,如何在调整分层因素后,用生存加权平均风险率概括总体治疗效应的绝对和相对大小?
方法与思路
作者以给定时间窗内的生存加权平均风险率为目标量,提出标准化分层方法,用差值和比值汇总组间治疗效应。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出传统分层汇总之外的标准化方法,可同时报告调整后的绝对与相对效应,作为分层 Cox 分析的替代选择。
阅读关注点
应核对标准化所用总体与层权重、时间窗选择、删失处理和推断条件,并检查与传统最优加权汇总的差异。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已同行评审或期刊接收;目标量不含研究特定删失,仍不能据摘要判断估计所需删失条件。

原文摘要

Given the limitations of using the Cox hazard ratio to summarize the magnitude of the treatment effect, alternative measures that do not have these limitations are gaining attention. One of the recently proposed alternative methods uses the average hazard with survival weight (AH). This population quantity can be interpreted as the average intensity of the event occurrence in a given time window that does not involve study-specific censoring. Inference procedures for the ratio of AH and difference in AH have already been proposed in simple randomized controlled trial settings to compare two groups. However, methods with stratification factors have not been well discussed, although stratified analysis is often used in practice to adjust for confounding factors and increase the power to detect a between-group difference. The conventional stratified analysis or meta-analysis approach, which integrates stratum-specific treatment effects using an optimal weight, directly applies to the ratio of AH and difference in AH. However, this conventional approach has significant limitations similar to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method for a binary outcome and the stratified Cox procedure for a time-to-event outcome. To address this, we propose a new stratified analysis method for AH using standardization. With the proposed method, one can summarize the between-group treatment effect in both absolute difference and relative terms, adjusting for stratification factors. This can be a valuable alternative to the traditional stratified Cox procedure to estimate and report the magnitude of the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes using hazard.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文