An Empirical Bayes Method for Chi-Squared Data
卡方数据的经验贝叶斯方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦卡方数据的经验贝叶斯与选择偏差校正,未明确涉及所列经济计量细分。
卡方数据的经验贝叶斯方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In a thought-provoking paper, Efron investigated the merit and limitation of an empirical Bayes method to correct selection bias based on Tweedie’s formula first reported in the study by Robbins. The exceptional virtue of Tweedie’s formula for the normal distribution lies in its representation of selection bias as a simple function of the derivative of log marginal likelihood. Since the marginal likelihood and its derivative can be estimated from the data directly without invoking prior information, bias correction can be carried out conveniently. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model for chi-squared data such that the resulting Tweedie’s formula has the same virtue as that of the normal distribution. Because the family of noncentral chi-squared distributions, the common alternative distributions for chi-squared tests, does not constitute an exponential family, our results cannot be obtained by extending existing results. Furthermore, the corresponding Tweedie’s formula manifests new phenomena quite different from those of the normal distribution and suggests new ways of analyzing chi-squared data.