Testing Exponentiality Versus a Trend Change in Mean Residual Life
指数性与平均剩余寿命趋势转折的检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究寿命分布的老化趋势与生存检验,未涉及宏观结构变化或其他所列领域。
指数性与平均剩余寿命趋势转折的检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Given that an item is of age $t$, the expected value of the random remaining life is called the mean residual life (MRL) at age $t$. We propose two new nonparametric classes of life distributions for modeling aging based on MRL. The first class of life distributions consists of those with "increasing initially, then decreasing mean residual life" (IDMRL). The IDMRL class models aging that is initially beneficial, then adverse. The second class, "decreasing, then increasing mean residual life" (DIMRL), models aging that is initially adverse, then beneficial. We propose two testing procedures for $H_0$: constant MRL (i.e., exponentiality) versus $H_1$: IDMRL, but not constant MRL (or $H'_1$: DIMRL, but not constant MRL). The first testing procedure assumes the turning point, $\tau$, from IMRL to DMRL is specified by the user or is known. The second procedure assumes knowledge of the proportion, $\rho$, of the population that "dies" at or before the turning point (knowledge of $\tau$ itself is not assumed).