跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究球面空间与时空随机场,未明确涉及宏观时间序列等所列细分方向,因此保留空分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Emilio Porcu
Moreno Bevilacqua
Marc G. Genton

球面大圆距离下的时空协方差与交叉协方差函数

研究问题
如何基于球面上的大圆距离构造时空和多变量协方差函数,距离选择又会怎样影响空间尺度估计与预测?
方法与思路
作者提出以大圆距离构造协方差函数的方法及闭式表达,通过模拟和臭氧数据比较大圆、弦长与地图投影距离。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称距离选择会明显影响空间尺度参数估计;所述预测差异主要在点间距离较大时出现,并提供示例说明。
阅读关注点
应核对协方差函数有效性的条件、时间与空间依赖的结合方式,以及模拟和臭氧应用中距离比较的设计。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;函数形式、参数限制和具体比较结果未提供,不能推断所有球面数据上的预测差异或刊本变化。

原文摘要

In this article, we propose stationary covariance functions for processes that evolve temporally over a sphere, as well as cross-covariance functions for multivariate random fields defined over a sphere. For such processes, the great circle distance is the natural metric that should be used to describe spatial dependence. Given the mathematical difficulties for the construction of covariance functions for processes defined over spheres cross time, approximations of the state of nature have been proposed in the literature by using the Euclidean (based on map projections) and the chordal distances. We present several methods of construction based on the great circle distance and provide closed-form expressions for both spatio-temporal and multivariate cases. A simulation study assesses the discrepancy between the great circle distance, chordal distance, and Euclidean distance based on a map projection both in terms of estimation and prediction in a space-time and a bivariate spatial setting, where the space is in this case the Earth. We revisit the analysis of Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) data and investigate differences in terms of estimation and prediction between the aforementioned distance-based approaches. Both simulation and real data highlight sensible differences in terms of estimation of the spatial scale parameter. As far as prediction is concerned, the differences can be appreciated only when the interpoint distances are large, as demonstrated by an illustrative example. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文