跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论调查测量误差与方差分量估计,访员造成的相关性不足以支持网络干扰或其他所列方向的分类。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. Kleffe
N. G. N. Prasad
J. N. K. Rao

加性模型下相关响应方差的“最优”估计

研究问题
调查中的访员或编码员相关误差会使常规方差估计偏低,如何估计这些误差贡献以改善调查精度的评估?
方法与思路
作者将最小范数二次无偏估计用于包含交错及非交错访员分配的实验,推导便于计算的相关响应方差估计表达式。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出便于计算的估计形式,并在误差方差和工作量相等的平衡情形下,与若干既有估计方法比较效率。
阅读关注点
应核对访员分配如何识别各误差分量、“最优”所对应的准则,以及平衡情形的效率比较能否扩展到非平衡设计。
阅读边界
仅有 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;效率评价限定于所述平衡情形,未提供具体结果,不能推断普遍优势或刊本变化。

原文摘要

Additive models are often employed to measure the impact of response errors on the accuracy of survey estimates. An important feature of these models is that the correlated errors from specified error sources, such as interviewers and coders, contribute additive components, called correlated response variance (CRV) components, to the total variance of a survey estimator. As a result of these correlated components, the usual estimators of variance of a mean or a total are negatively biased, thus overstating the reliability of estimates. The underestimation, however, can be reduced or eliminated if estimates of CRV components are available. Further, the estimated CRV components can be employed as measures of quality of the particular operation(s) under investigation, for example, interviewer performance. The method of minimum norm quadratic unbiased estimation, due to C. R. Rao, is applied to obtain “optimal” estimators of CRV from interviewer variance experiments involving both interpenetrated and noninterpenetrated interviewer assignments (interpenetration means random assignment of sample units within an enumeration area to two or more interviewers). A computationally convenient expression for the minimum norm quadratic unbiased (MINQU) estimators is derived. Efficiency of the MINQU estimator relative to the analysis of variance estimators of Fellegi, the composite estimator of Biemer and Stokes, and the MINQU estimator from interpenetrated data alone is evaluated in the balanced case of equal error variances and equal work loads across enumeration areas.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文