Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Time-Dependent Accuracy Measures for Survival Outcome Under Two-Stage Sampling Designs
两阶段抽样下生存结局时变准确性指标的非参数极大似然估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及医学标志物评价与两阶段抽样,不能据此归入宏观预测或其他所列细分。
两阶段抽样下生存结局时变准确性指标的非参数极大似然估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Large prospective cohort studies of rare chronic diseases require thoughtful planning of study designs, especially for biomarker studies when measurements are based on stored tissue or blood specimens. Two-phase designs, including nested case–control and case-cohort sampling designs, provide cost-effective strategies for conducting biomarker evaluation studies.Existing literature for biomarker assessment under two-phase designs largely focuses on simple inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimators. Drawing on recent theoretical development on the maximum likelihood estimators for relative risk parameters in two-phase studies, we propose nonparametric maximum likelihood-based estimators to evaluate the accuracy and predictiveness of a risk prediction biomarker under both types of two-phase designs. In addition, hybrid estimators that combine IPW estimators and maximum likelihood estimation procedure are proposed to improve efficiency and alleviate computational burden. We derive large sample properties of proposed estimators and evaluate their finite sample performance using numerical studies. We illustrate new procedures using a two-phase biomarker study aiming to evaluate the accuracy of a novel biomarker, des-γ-carboxy prothrombin, for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.