Relationships—and the Lack Thereof—Between Economic Time Series, with Special Reference to Money and Interest Rates
经济时间序列的联系及其缺失:货币与利率AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:题名与摘要明确讨论货币、利率等经济时间序列,并以 Box–Jenkins 建模及自相关处理为核心。
经济时间序列的联系及其缺失:货币与利率AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Extensions of time-series modeling procedures of Box and Jenkins [5] reveal that numerous economic variables which are generally regarded as being strongly interrelated may with equal validity, based on recent empirical evidence, be regarded as independent or only weakly related. Differences between these results and the bulk of econometric literature are attributed to the failure of the latter to satisfactorily account for autocorrelation. Due to limitations in the data, it is concluded that in many instances where economic relationships clearly do exist, econometric or other empirical means cannot reliably enable their existence to be ascertained.