Large Sample Theory of Some Measures of Income Inequality
若干收入不平等测度的大样本理论AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究收入不平等指标及其抽样分布,涉及收入分布特征的估计与推断,因此归入分位数与分布方向。
若干收入不平等测度的大样本理论AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
THE MEASUREMENT of economic inequality is a timely and important topic. Often the Gini index or the entire Lorenz curve is used; however, the relative mean deviation (or Pietra ratio) has been used by Schutz [9] and Budd [1] to study United States data. Eltet6 and Frigyes [2] developed new measures to aid in their analysis of Hungary's income distribution, and Kondor [6] has shown that these new indices are related to the relative mean deviation. In order to draw valid conclusions from actual samples, one needs to know the sampling distribution of the statistic used to estimate the measure of inequality. The purpose of the present paper is to adapt methods used by the author [3 and 4] in another context to obtain the large sample theory of the mean deviation, Pietra ratio, and the measures of Eltet6 and Frigyes. Since several of these measures estimate some parameters of the underlying income distribution function, the asymptotic theory of the estimators is more complicated than might appear at first glance.