跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究未观测混杂存在时平均处理效应的近端识别、双重稳健估计与半参数效率。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yifan Cui
Hongming Pu
Xu Shi
Wang Miao

半参数近端因果推断

研究问题
观测协变量只是潜在混杂机制的不完美代理、基于这些协变量的可交换性不成立时,如何识别并有效估计平均处理效应?
方法与思路
作者在近端因果推断框架内提出替代识别条件,建立平均处理效应的半参数理论,并刻画双重稳健和局部有效估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,给出平均处理效应的非参数识别条件与效率界,并扩展至受处理者平均效应,辅以模拟和重症监护导管应用。
阅读关注点
应核对代理变量承担的不同角色、近端识别条件和估计方程,以及双重稳健性对应的模型组合与局部效率的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;完整识别条件及代理变量要求未说明,不能视为任意未观测混杂下都可识别。

原文摘要

Skepticism about the assumption of no unmeasured confounding, also known as exchangeability, is often warranted in making causal inferences from observational data; because exchangeability hinges on an investigator's ability to accurately measure covariates that capture all potential sources of confounding.In practice, the most one can hope for is that covariate measurements are at best proxies of the true underlying confounding mechanism operating in a given observational study.In this article, we consider the framework of proximal causal inference introduced by Miao, Geng, and Tchetgen Tchetgen and Tchetgen Tchetgen et al. which while explicitly acknowledging covariate measurements as imperfect proxies of confounding mechanisms, offers an opportunity to learn about causal effects in settings where exchangeability on the basis of measured covariates fails.We make a number of contributions to proximal inference including (i) an alternative set of conditions for nonparametric proximal identification of the average treatment effect; (ii) general semiparametric theory for proximal estimation of the average treatment effect including efficiency bounds for key semiparametric models of interest; (iii) a characterization of proximal doubly robust and locally efficient estimators of the average treatment effect.Moreover, we provide analogous identification and efficiency results for the average treatment effect on the treated.Our approach is illustrated via simulation studies and a data application on evaluating the effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the intensive care unit of critically ill patients.Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文