跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要利用光照变化构造识别比较,并明确讨论维持假设、漏报稳健性与敏感性分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jeffrey Grogger
Greg Ridgeway

利用黑暗遮蔽检验交通拦截中的种族差别对待

研究问题
在缺少被拦截风险人群可靠基准时,能否利用白昼与黑暗中司机种族可见性的差异,检验交通拦截的种族差别对待?
方法与思路
作者比较白昼与黑暗下被拦司机的种族分布,限制傍晚样本并控制钟表时间,同时分析漏报稳健条件和假设敏感性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法无需外部风险人群估计,并提出减弱维持假设及评估敏感性的办法;奥克兰示例中差别对待证据较少。
阅读关注点
应核对光照如何改变种族可见性、驾驶与执法暴露随光照变化的限制,以及时间控制、漏报和敏感性分析的识别作用。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;识别仍依赖交通行为与执法暴露等假设,单个城市的有限证据不能证明不存在歧视。

原文摘要

The key problem in testing for racial profiling in traffic stops is estimating the risk set, or “benchmark,” against which to compare the race distribution of stopped drivers. To date, the two most common approaches have been to use residential population data or to conduct traffic surveys in which observers tally the race distribution of drivers at a certain location. It is widely recognized that residential population data provide poor estimates of the population at risk of a traffic stop; at the same time, traffic surveys have limitations and are more costly to carry out than the alternative that we propose herein. In this article we propose a test for racial profiling that does not require explicit, external estimates of the risk set. Rather, our approach makes use of what we call the “veil of darkness” hypothesis, which asserts that police are less likely to know the race of a motorist before making a stop after dark than they are during daylight. If we assume that racial differences in traffic patterns, driving behavior, and exposure to law enforcement do not vary between daylight and darkness, then we can test for racial profiling by comparing the race distribution of stops made during daylight to the race distribution of stops made after dark. We propose a means of weakening this assumption by restricting the sample to stops made during the evening hours and controlling for clock time while estimating daylight/darkness contrasts in the race distribution of stopped drivers. We provide conditions under which our estimates are robust to a substantial nonreporting problem present in our data and in many other studies of racial profiling. We propose an approach to assess the sensitivity of our results to departures from our maintained assumptions. Finally, we apply our method to data from Oakland, California and find that in this example the data yield little evidence of racial profiling in traffic stops.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文