跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦职业安全的通用机器学习预测,未提供归入所列宏观、金融或微观计量细分的充分依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Aho Yapi
Pierre Latouche
Arnaud Guillin
Yan Bailly

融合安全检查的职业事故预测机器学习框架

研究问题
如何将日常安全检查记录转化为职业事故的短期预测,并把每日事故风险汇总为可用于安排检查与干预的周度评估?
方法与思路
作者把事故发生建模为二元时间序列,比较逻辑回归、树模型与神经网络,采用滑动窗口验证和期间汇总指标评价预测。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该框架在所测试算法中能够识别未来高风险时段,并将检查数据转为日度和周度风险分数,支持安全资源安排。
阅读关注点
应核对检查信息在预测时是否可得、窗口划分与汇总规则,以及稀有事故情形下的校准表现和跨场景泛化能力。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审及期刊接收未核实;摘要未说明样本、具体指标和数值,也未验证干预实际降低事故的效果。

原文摘要

We propose a model-agnostic framework for short-term occupational accident forecasting that leverages safety inspections and models accident occurrences as binary time series. The approach generates daily predictions, which are then aggregated into weekly safety assessments for better decision making. To ensure the reliability and operational applicability of the forecasts, we apply a sliding-window cross-validation procedure specifically designed for time series data, combined with an evaluation based on aggregated period-level metrics. Several machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression, tree-based models, and neural networks, are trained and systematically compared within this framework. Across all tested algorithms, the proposed framework reliably identifies upcoming high-risk periods and delivers robust period-level performance, demonstrating that converting safety inspections into binary time series yields actionable, short-term risk signals. The proposed methodology converts routine safety inspection data into clear weekly and daily risk scores, detecting the periods when accidents are most likely to occur. Decision-makers can integrate these scores into their planning tools to classify inspection priorities, schedule targeted interventions, and funnel resources to the sites or shifts classified as highest risk, stepping in before incidents occur and getting the greatest return on safety investments.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文