跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般多重检验中的协变量加权,没有直接涉及所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wolfgang Huber

利用协变量信息的交叉加权多重检验

研究问题
论文研究如何利用检验层面的协变量异质性提高多重检验功效,同时控制第一类错误并避免权重学习过拟合。
方法与思路
作者通过独立假设加权框架学习协变量权重,采用交叉加权的数据拆分方法,允许同一折内存在任意依赖。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在检验可分成相互独立的折等条件下,可获得有限样本错误发现率控制,并利用协变量加权改善检测功效。
阅读关注点
应核对真零假设下 p 值与协变量独立的要求、折间独立性、权重学习流程,以及错误控制和功效比较的具体条件。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要。有限样本保证依赖所述独立性条件,不能推广到任意跨折依赖;摘要未给出功效提升幅度。

原文摘要

Abstract A fundamental task in the analysis of data sets with many variables is screening for associations. This can be cast as a multiple testing task, where the objective is achieving high detection power while controlling type I error. We consider m hypothesis tests represented by pairs ((Pi,Xi))1≤i≤m of p-values Pi and covariates Xi, such that Pi⊥Xi if Hi is null. Here, we show how to use information potentially available in the covariates about heterogeneities among hypotheses to increase power compared to conventional procedures that only use the Pi. To this end, we upgrade existing weighted multiple testing procedures through the independent hypothesis weighting (IHW) framework to use data-driven weights that are calculated as a function of the covariates. Finite sample guarantees, for example false discovery rate control, are derived from cross-weighting, a data-splitting approach that enables learning the weight-covariate function without overfitting as long as the hypotheses can be partitioned into independent folds, with arbitrary within-fold dependence. IHW has increased power compared to methods that do not use covariate information. A key implication of IHW is that hypothesis rejection in common multiple testing setups should not proceed according to the ranking of the p-values, but by an alternative ranking implied by the covariate-weighted p-values.

笔记与分组