Weak signal identification and inference in penalized model selection
惩罚模型选择中的弱信号识别与推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用惩罚模型选择与选择后推断,未涉及因果识别或其他所列细分方向。
惩罚模型选择中的弱信号识别与推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Weak signal identification and inference are very important in the area of penalized model selection, yet they are underdeveloped and not well studied. Existing inference procedures for penalized estimators are mainly focused on strong signals. In this paper, we propose an identification procedure for weak signals in finite samples, and provide a transition phase in-between noise and strong signal strengths. We also introduce a new two-step inferential method to construct better confidence intervals for the identified weak signals. Our theory development assumes that variables are orthogonally designed. Both theory and numerical studies indicate that the proposed method leads to better confidence coverage for weak signals, compared with those using asymptotic inference. In addition, the proposed method outperforms the perturbation and bootstrap resampling approaches. We illustrate our method for HIV antiretroviral drug susceptibility data to identify genetic mutations associated with HIV drug resistance.