跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究组内干扰下的随机化因果效应推断,直接对应因果推断与干扰方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lan Liu
Michael G. Hudgens

存在干扰时因果效应的大样本随机化推断

研究问题
当个体处理可能影响同组其他成员、但组间不存在干扰时,如何在两阶段随机化设计下推断不同类型的因果效应?
方法与思路
作者先随机分配组的处理配置策略,再在组内随机分配个体处理;分别推导组内人数或组数增大时的估计量渐近分布。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在一定同质性假设下可构造沃尔德区间与检验;组数不太少时,经验比较显示区间覆盖良好且更窄。
阅读关注点
应核对不同效应的定义、组间无干扰和同质性条件,并区分两种渐近框架及有限组数下区间表现的边界。
阅读边界
摘要未具体列出同质性假设或组数门槛,不能把区间表现推广至任意干扰结构。所据索引摘要版本未注明,刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

Recently, increasing attention has focused on making causal inference when interference is possible. In the presence of interference, treatment may have several types of effects. In this paper, we consider inference about such effects when the population consists of groups of individuals where interference is possible within groups but not between groups. A two stage randomization design is assumed where in the first stage groups are randomized to different treatment allocation strategies and in the second stage individuals are randomized to treatment or control conditional on the strategy assigned to their group in the first stage. For this design, the asymptotic distributions of estimators of the causal effects are derived when either the number of individuals per group or the number of groups grows large. Under certain homogeneity assumptions, the asymptotic distributions provide justification for Wald-type confidence intervals (CIs) and tests. Empirical results demonstrate the Wald CIs have good coverage in finite samples and are narrower than CIs based on either the Chebyshev or Hoeffding inequalities provided the number of groups is not too small. The methods are illustrated by two examples which consider the effects of cholera vaccination and an intervention to encourage voting.

笔记与分组