跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究集群随机实验的处理效应目标量、协变量调整与稳健因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Bingkai Wang
Chan Park
Dylan S. Small
Fan Li

集群随机实验中模型稳健且有效的协变量调整

研究问题
集群随机实验中,如何在工作模型误设与处理相关的集群规模变化下,对集群平均和个体平均处理效应进行稳健推断?
方法与思路
作者用加权 g 计算改造广义估计方程和线性混合模型,并为两类目标量提出允许灵活调整、处理规模变化的估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称机器学习辅助函数满足一致估计条件时可获一致性、渐近正态与效率;参数模型下具有三重稳健性,并报告比较研究。
阅读关注点
应核对两类目标量的权重、处理后集群规模的处理方式、三重稳健性的模型组合,以及效率结论的完整条件。
阅读边界
依据 arXiv 2210.07324v3 预印本摘要,不能据此声称已同行评审或获期刊接收;摘要未列出完整效率条件,所称优于替代方法限于其比较,刊本变化未知。

原文摘要

Cluster-randomized experiments are increasingly used to evaluate interventions in routine practice conditions, and researchers often adopt model-based methods with covariate adjustment in the statistical analyses. However, the validity of model-based covariate adjustment is unclear when the working models are misspecified, leading to ambiguity of estimands and risk of bias. In this article, we first adapt two conventional model-based methods, generalized estimating equations and linear mixed models, with weighted g-computation to achieve robust inference for cluster-average and individual-average treatment effects. To further overcome the limitations of model-based covariate adjustment methods, we propose an efficient estimator for each estimand that allows for flexible covariate adjustment and additionally addresses cluster size variation dependent on treatment assignment and other cluster characteristics. Such cluster size variations often occur post-randomization and, if ignored, can lead to bias of model-based estimators. For our proposed efficient covariate-adjusted estimator, we prove that when the nuisance functions are consistently estimated by machine learning algorithms, the estimator is consistent, asymptotically normal, and efficient. When the nuisance functions are estimated via parametric working models, the estimator is triply-robust. Simulation studies and analyses of three real-world cluster-randomized experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods are superior to existing alternatives.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文