跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究未观测混杂、条件独立识别和倾向得分调整,与因果推断的方法问题直接相关,但其目标表述为疾病关联优势比。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
D. Y. Lin
D. Zeng

全基因组关联研究中的群体分层校正

研究问题
当祖源亚群的等位基因频率和疾病风险同时不同、导致虚假关联时,如何识别并估计遗传变异与疾病之间的优势比?
方法与思路
作者利用无病人群中的条件独立条件,通过含基因型倾向得分任意函数的半参数 logistic 回归建模,并用 B 样条近似。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,给出优势比可识别的充要条件;在该条件下获得一致、渐近正态的估计量及一致方差估计,并展示模拟与应用。
阅读关注点
应核对无病人群中条件独立的精确含义、祖源标记的作用,以及倾向得分估计和样条近似条件,并区分关联与因果解释。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要。识别结论依赖特定条件,摘要未给出全部估计条件;不能将优势比直接解释为因果效应或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Genomewide association studies have become the primary tool for discovering the genetic basis of complex human diseases. Such studies are susceptible to the confounding effects of population stratification, in that the combination of allele-frequency heterogeneity with disease-risk heterogeneity among different ancestral subpopulations can induce spurious associations between genetic variants and disease. This article provides a statistically rigorous and computationally feasible solution to this challenging problem of unmeasured confounders. We show that the odds ratio of disease with a genetic variant is identifiable if and only if the genotype is independent of the unknown population substructure conditional on a set of observed ancestry-informative markers in the disease-free population. Under this condition, the odds ratio of interest can be estimated by fitting a semiparametric logistic regression model with an arbitrary function of a propensity score relating the genotype probability to ancestry-informative markers. Approximating the unknown function of the propensity score by B-splines, we derive a consistent and asymptotically normal estimator for the odds ratio of interest with a consistent variance estimator. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed inference procedures perform well in realistic settings. An application to the well-known Wellcome Trust Case-Control Study is presented. Supplemental materials are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文