跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及通用删失数据与秩检验,没有直接讨论分位数效应或其他所列细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Willem Albers
Michael G. Akritas

随机删失数据两样本问题的组合秩检验

研究问题
在随机删失的两样本比较中,能否分别排序删失和未删失观测后组合检验,同时保持易用性与良好的渐近性质?
方法与思路
作者分别构造两组秩统计量再组合,并对删失分布与生存分布的关系施加限制,以获得较简单的得分函数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法无需计算 Kaplan–Meier 估计量,分开排序的渐近损失可忽略,并以精确效率计算及模拟考察限制的影响。
阅读关注点
应核对随机删失及受限适应的具体条件、两组统计量的组合方式,以及效率损失结论和模拟比较的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;具体删失函数关系和效率数值未提供。

原文摘要

In the two-sample problem under random censorship we consider the uncensored observations and the censored ones as two separate groups. For each group a suitable rank statistic is obtained, and these two are then combined to a final one. This idea, which was first employed in Akritas (1983), is shown here to produce tests that (a) closely resemble the ordinary rank tests for the uncensored case and do not require the calculation of the Kaplan-Meier estimator, (b) are comparatively easy to apply and to understand, and (c) allow results on asymptotic normality to follow simply from standard results for the uncensored case. It is shown that the loss due to using two separate rankings rather than one complete ranking is asymptotically negligible. The optimal score function for each of the two separate rank statistics is seen to depend on the censoring distribution. Whereas in Akritas (1983) no assumption on the form of the censoring distribution was made (unrestricted adaptation), here we pursue restricted adaptation that results in simple score functions. In particular, motivated by the model of Koziol and Green (1976), we assume that the censoring distribution is a suitable function of the survival distribution. An example related to the Wilcoxon test is used for illustration. The effect of restricted adaptation on the efficiency of the test is examined by both exact efficiency calculations and simulation results.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文