跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论城市地租、区位需求与土地利用的理论关系,未呈现结构估计、因果识别或其他给定细分方向的充分依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Karl Pribram

城市土地的剩余、级差与绝对地租及其周期波动

研究问题
研究以剩余租金解释土地价值的思路如何用于城市土地,以及城市地租为何会随区位服务需求与土地利用强度而出现差异。
方法与思路
摘要回顾李嘉图与维塞尔的地租理论,比较农业成本差异与城市物业服务需求差异,并讨论优势区位的横向、纵向集约利用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要介绍的理论将城市区位的剩余租金主要联系于服务需求和价格差异,并区分其与农业级差收益的来源;作者最终结论未呈现。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对剩余、级差与绝对地租的定义和相互关系,城市区位与建筑投入如何进入分析,以及题名所述周期波动的具体机制。
阅读边界
所供文本带有脚注且中途截断,未展开题名中的绝对地租与周期波动;无法据此判断完整理论、经验依据或适用范围。

原文摘要

THE OBJECTIONS which have been raised against the fundamentals of the value theory of the classical school of economics hardly ever went so far as to affect the principle upon which the Ricardian explanation of land values was based, viz., the idea that the value of land is not to be explained in terms of cost, but in terms of a residual rent. This idea when developed into its consequences has even facilitated the insight into many value phenomena other than land values. However neither Ricardo nor his postclassical followers ever attempted thoroughly to examine the question whether and with what modifications the residual rent concept can be used in interpreting the economic phenomena presented by the existence of urban land values. To my knowledge the first author who undertook the task of establishing a consistent theory of the urban ground rent was the Austrian economist F. von Wieser.' Wieser emphasized an important distinction obtaining between the agricultural ground rent and its urban counterpart with respect to the relations between the factors which are instrumental in producing the differential returns: the former is due to the fact that, owing to increased demand for farm products, agricultural production may be profitable also at increased costs, with the result that a surplus profit accrues to those farmers whose production is privileged by lower costs. On the other hand, according to the Wieserian theory, the residual rent of urban sites is largely independent of differences in costs of construction; it is due to differences in the demand for the services rendered by different real-estate properties and, consequently, to differences in the prices paid for such services. Von Wieser has specified his theory by distinguishing within each locality a range of housing markets which differ according to the situation of the sites. The tendency to exploit the privileged sites to the fullest possible degree is reflected in the process of intensifying the utilization of land of this type both horizontally and vertically. The larger the portion of the lot which is utilized for dwelling and renting purposes and. in addition. the larger the number of dwellinL;s and premises * Paper presented at Colorado Springs, July 26 and 27, 1939, before Cowles Commission Fifth Annual Research Conference on Economics and Statistics, under title of Some Dynamic Aspects of the Urban Ground Rent. 1 v. Wieser, Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Wirtschaft in Grundriss der Sozialdkonomie, 1, p. 362.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文