跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般神经网络非参数回归,未限定时间序列、收益预测或其他所列细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xuancheng Wang
Ling Zhou
Huazhen Lin

采用最优损失函数的深度回归学习

研究问题
如何在前馈神经网络非参数回归中构造数据驱动的损失,使估计适应重尾、多峰或异质分布,并兼顾效率与稳健性?
方法与思路
作者以估计的似然信息构造基于概率的损失,避免预先指定分布形式,再利用前馈神经网络估计非参数回归函数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方法具有近极小极大超额风险速率,并在超额风险意义下与已知密度的真实最大似然估计等价;模拟和应用展示其表现。
阅读关注点
应核对密度估计与网络训练的衔接、超额风险等价性的条件,以及稳健性定义、比较基准和样本外预测评估设计。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;效率与稳健性的具体适用条件未说明,模拟中的优势不能视为一般结论或刊本结果。

原文摘要

In this article, we develop a novel efficient and robust nonparametric regression estimator under a framework of a feedforward neural network (FNN). There are several interesting characteristics for the proposed estimator. First, the loss function is built upon an estimated maximum likelihood function, which integrates the information from observed data as well as the information from the data distribution. Consequently, the resulting estimator has desirable optimal properties, such as efficiency. Second, different from the traditional maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), the proposed method avoids the specification of the distribution, making it adaptable to various distributions such as heavy tails and multimodal or heterogeneous distributions. Third, the proposed loss function relies on probabilities rather than direct observations as in least square loss, contributing to the robustness of the proposed estimator. Finally, the proposed loss function involves a nonparametric regression function only. This enables the direct application of the existing packages, simplifying the computational and programming requirements. We establish the large sample property of the proposed estimator in terms of its excess risk and minimax near-optimal rate. The theoretical results demonstrate that the proposed estimator is equivalent to the true MLE where the density function is known in terms of excess risk. Our simulation studies show that the proposed estimator outperforms the existing methods based on prediction accuracy, efficiency and robustness. Particularly, it is comparable to the MLE with the known density and even gets slightly better as the sample size increases. This implies that the adaptive and data-driven loss function from the estimated density may offer an additional avenue for capturing valuable information. We further apply the proposed method to four real data examples, resulting in significantly reduced out-of-sample prediction errors compared to existing methods. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文