Empirical Bayes Methods for Combining Likelihoods
合并似然的经验贝叶斯方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论跨实验的通用经验贝叶斯似然组合,没有面板、因果或其他细分的充分证据。
合并似然的经验贝叶斯方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Suppose that several independent experiments are observed, each one yielding a likelihood L k (θ k ) for a real-valued parameter of interest θ k . For example, θ k might be the log-odds ratio for a 2 × 2 table relating to the kth population in a series of medical experiments. This article concerns the following empirical Bayes question: How can we combine all of the likelihoods L k to get an interval estimate for any one of the θ k 's, say θ1? The results are presented in the form of a realistic computational scheme that allows model building and model checking in the spirit of a regression analysis. No special mathematical forms are required for the priors or the likelihoods. This scheme is designed to take advantage of recent methods that produce approximate numerical likelihoods L k (θ k ) even in very complicated situations, with all nuisance parameters eliminated. The empirical Bayes likelihood theory is extended to situations where the θ k 's have a regression structure as well as an empirical Bayes relationship. Most of the discussion is presented in terms of a hierarchical Bayes model and concerns how such a model can be implemented without requiring large amounts of Bayesian input. Frequentist approaches, such as bias correction and robustness, play a central role in the methodology.