Selecting Therapeutic Strategies Based on Efficacy and Death in Multicourse Clinical Trials
基于疗效与死亡结果选择多疗程临床试验治疗策略AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要侧重多疗程临床决策、贝叶斯分析和试验设计,未明确展开所列细分方向中的因果效应识别方法。
基于疗效与死亡结果选择多疗程临床试验治疗策略AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Therapy of rapidly fatal diseases often requires multiple courses of treatment. In each course, the treatment may achieve the desired clinical goal (“response”), the patient may survive without response (“failure”), or the patient may die. When treatment fails in a given course, it is common medical practice to switch to a different treatment for the next course. Most statistical approaches to such settings simply ignore the multicourse structure. They characterize patient outcome as a single binary variable, combine death and failure, and identify only one treatment for each patient. Such approaches waste important information. We provide a statistical framework, including a family of generalized logistic regression models and an approximate Bayesian method, that incorporates historical data while accommodating multiple treatment courses, a trinary outcome in each course, and patient prognostic covariates. The framework serves as a basis for data analysis, treatment evaluation, and clinical trial design. In contrast with the usual approach of evaluating individual treatments, our methodology evaluates outcome-adaptive, multicourse treatment strategies that specify, within prognostic subgroups, which treatment to give in each course. We describe a general approach for constructing clinical trial designs that may be tailored to different multicourse settings. For each prognostic subgroup, based on a real-valued function of the covariate-adjusted probabilities of response and death, the design drops inferior treatment strategies during the trial and selects the best strategy at the end. The methodology is illustrated in the context of designing a randomized two-course, three-treatment acute leukemia trial with two prognostic covariates. To validate the model and develop a prior, we first fit the model to a historical dataset. We describe a simulation study of the design under several clinical scenarios. The simulations show that the method can reliably identify treatment–subgroup interactions based on moderate sample sizes.
Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) is a popular Bayesian ensemble model used in regression and classification analysis. Under this modeling framework, the regression function is approximated by an ensemble of decision trees, interpreted as weak learners. In this work, we propose a generalization of the BART model that has two main features: first, it automatically selects the number of decision trees using the given data; second, the model allows clusters of…
估计纵向因果剂量反应关系的贝叶斯框架
Existing causal methods for time-varying exposure and time-varying confounding focus on estimating the average causal effect of a time-varying binary treatment on an end-of-study outcome, offering limited tools for characterizing marginal causal dose-response relationships under continuous exposures. We propose a scalable, nonparametric Bayesian framework for estimating marginal longitudinal causal dose-response functions with repeated outcome measurements. Our approach…
内生性检验:一种基于矩的贝叶斯方法
A standard assumption in the Bayesian estimation of linear regression models is that the regressors are exogenous in the sense that they are uncorrelated with the model error term. In practice, however, this assumption can be invalid. In this article, using the exponentially tilted empirical likelihood (ETEL) framework, we develop a Bayes factor test for endogeneity that compares a base model that is correctly specified under exogeneity but misspecified under endogeneity…
自适应实验中策略改进价值的推断
In this paper, we develop an asymptotically normal estimator for the value of policy improvement (VPI) under adaptively collected data. This value, which is defined as the gap between the value of the best treatment policy in a class and that of a baseline policy, gauges whether or not it is worth deploying a personalized treatment policy. Building an estimator for the VPI is naturally more difficult than estimating the value of a fixed policy. This is because, in addition…
读者与标注条件依赖参考标签下乳腺病理AI一致性的贝叶斯不确定性量化
Human reference labels used to evaluate medical AI can vary across readers and annotation workflows. We quantified agreement of a fixed pathology AI system with a future qualified reader without treating inferred consensus as error-free biological truth. Linked Evaluation and Unbiased NuCLS multirater data were analyzed using a fixed external HoVer-Net decision vector. The selected frame contained 1,144 anchors, 52 fields of view, five slides/patients, and five primary…
潜在类别对处理效应的调节
Many treatments have effects that plausibly vary by latent classes. For example, the effect of personalized video recommendations may be stronger for users who seek a new discovery than for users seeking to rewatch something familiar. In the context of user journeys on digital platforms, we can conceptualize user moods as dynamic latent states that lead to distinct action distributions. Because mood is unobserved, we infer it from a user's pre-treatment actions using a…