跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要侧重多疗程临床决策、贝叶斯分析和试验设计,未明确展开所列细分方向中的因果效应识别方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peter F Thall
Hsi-Guang Sung
Elihu H Estey

基于疗效与死亡结果选择多疗程临床试验治疗策略

研究问题
当患者可能在每一疗程出现响应、无响应存活或死亡,并在失败后更换治疗时,如何评价并选择多疗程治疗策略?
方法与思路
作者结合广义逻辑回归模型与近似贝叶斯方法,纳入历史数据、逐疗程三分类结局及预后协变量,开展策略评价和试验设计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架可按预后亚组淘汰和选择治疗策略,并以白血病试验设计及模拟说明其识别治疗与亚组交互的能力。
阅读关注点
应核对历史数据如何进入先验、疗效与死亡如何合成评价指标,以及策略淘汰规则和模拟中的误选风险与样本量设置。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的OpenAlex摘要;摘要未给出具体样本量、先验敏感性或策略选择误差,不能将模拟陈述推广到所有临床场景。

原文摘要

Therapy of rapidly fatal diseases often requires multiple courses of treatment. In each course, the treatment may achieve the desired clinical goal (“response”), the patient may survive without response (“failure”), or the patient may die. When treatment fails in a given course, it is common medical practice to switch to a different treatment for the next course. Most statistical approaches to such settings simply ignore the multicourse structure. They characterize patient outcome as a single binary variable, combine death and failure, and identify only one treatment for each patient. Such approaches waste important information. We provide a statistical framework, including a family of generalized logistic regression models and an approximate Bayesian method, that incorporates historical data while accommodating multiple treatment courses, a trinary outcome in each course, and patient prognostic covariates. The framework serves as a basis for data analysis, treatment evaluation, and clinical trial design. In contrast with the usual approach of evaluating individual treatments, our methodology evaluates outcome-adaptive, multicourse treatment strategies that specify, within prognostic subgroups, which treatment to give in each course. We describe a general approach for constructing clinical trial designs that may be tailored to different multicourse settings. For each prognostic subgroup, based on a real-valued function of the covariate-adjusted probabilities of response and death, the design drops inferior treatment strategies during the trial and selects the best strategy at the end. The methodology is illustrated in the context of designing a randomized two-course, three-treatment acute leukemia trial with two prognostic covariates. To validate the model and develop a prior, we first fit the model to a historical dataset. We describe a simulation study of the design under several clinical scenarios. The simulations show that the method can reliably identify treatment–subgroup interactions based on moderate sample sizes.

笔记与分组