跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本涉及通用条件独立检验和遗传关联研究,未提供因果推断或其他经济计量细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
M Sesia
C Sabatti
E J Candès

《利用隐马尔可夫模型 knockoff 寻找基因》作者回复

研究问题
这篇回复讨论基因关联研究中应选择条件还是边际假设,以及如何理解模型X的 knockoff 框架所检验的变量关联。
方法与思路
作者澄清给定其他预测变量后的条件独立假设,并借助多元高斯和广义线性模型情形解释其与偏相关或回归系数的关系。
材料陈述的贡献
所给回复强调假设选择取决于研究问题,并澄清条件检验与边际检验的目标差异,同时提到近期发展和仍待解决的问题。
阅读关注点
应核对条件独立、偏相关和零回归系数等价关系的适用条件,并将本回复的澄清与主论文的方法及结果分别阅读。
阅读边界
这是作者回复,索引未注明稿件版本;所给文字不能替代主论文,亦未展示 knockoff 构造、错误率保证或应用结果。

原文摘要

We are very grateful to the editors for the opportunity to expand and deepen the reflection on the possible advantages of a knockoff approach to genome-wide association studies. The discussants bring up a number of important points, related to either the knockoffs methodology in general or its specific application to genetic studies. In this rejoinder we offer some clarifications, mention relevant recent developments, and highlight a few remaining open problems. The model-X framework of knockoffs (Candès et al., 2018) addresses a general multiple testing problem in which the |$j$|th null hypothesis states that the response |$Y$| is independent of the explanatory variable |$X_j$| conditional on all other predictors |$X_{-j}$|⁠. In the very special case where the joint distribution of |$X$| and |$Y$| is multivariate Gaussian, this is equivalent to testing for the presence of conditional or partial correlations (Rosenblatt et al., 2019). In general, the nonnull variables in the model-X framework are those belonging to the Markov blanket of |$X$| on |$Y$| (Candès et al., 2018). There is little sense in arguing that, generally speaking, conditional or marginal hypotheses are the right ones to test: the choice between these two approaches will clearly depend on the problem at hand. For example, if |$Y$| describes the cancer status of a tissue sample and each |$X_j$| the expression level of gene |$j$|⁠, one might be interested in testing the hypotheses that |$Y\perp\!\!\!\perp X_j$|⁠. The rejections of these null hypotheses would describe all genes whose expression level changes with cancer status. Whenever we think of relating a response |$Y$| with a linear, or generalized linear, model in terms of |$X$|⁠, and test the hypotheses that the regression coefficients vanish, we are testing hypotheses that are of a conditional flavour. These hypotheses correspond exactly to the conditional ones in the case where the response follows a generalized linear model; see Candès et al. (2018).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文