A discrete bouncy particle sampler
离散弹跳粒子采样器AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用蒙特卡洛采样算法,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的直接依据。
反馈分类问题离散弹跳粒子采样器AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary Most Markov chain Monte Carlo methods operate in discrete time and are reversible with respect to the target probability. Nevertheless, it is now understood that the use of nonreversible Markov chains can be beneficial in many contexts. In particular, the recently proposed bouncy particle sampler leverages a continuous-time and nonreversible Markov process, and empirically shows state-of-the-art performance when used to explore certain probability densities; however, its implementation typically requires the computation of local upper bounds on the gradient of the log target density. We present the discrete bouncy particle sampler, a general algorithm based on a guided random walk, a partial refreshment of direction and a delayed-rejection step. We show that the bouncy particle sampler can be understood as a scaling limit of a special case of our algorithm. In contrast to the bouncy particle sampler, implementing the discrete bouncy particle sampler only requires pointwise evaluation of the target density and its gradient. We propose extensions of the basic algorithm for situations when the exact gradient of the target density is not available. In a Gaussian setting, we establish a scaling limit for the radial process as the dimension increases to infinity. We leverage this result to obtain the theoretical efficiency of the discrete bouncy particle sampler as a function of the partial-refreshment parameter, which leads to a simple and robust tuning criterion. A further analysis in a more general setting suggests that this tuning criterion applies more generally. Theoretical and empirical efficiency curves are then compared for different targets and algorithm variations.