跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究两阶段随机化下的治疗效应及个体间干扰、溢出,直接对应因果推断与网络干扰方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Guillaume Basse
Avi Feller

存在干扰时两阶段随机实验的分析

研究问题
当一个人的治疗影响其他人的结果且家庭规模不同时,如何定义并估计两阶段随机实验中的个体与家庭加权效应?
方法与思路
作者为多类加权目标构造无偏估计量及方差,连接线性回归与随机化推断,并讨论利用协变量提高精度的方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,适当选择标准误后,两种分析方式的点估计与方差估计相同;出勤干预应用中发现具有实质意义的溢出效应。
阅读关注点
应核对干扰范围与效应定义、家庭和个体权重的差别、回归等价所需的标准误,以及协变量调整和方差估计细节。
阅读边界
来源为版本未注明的索引摘要;摘要未完整说明干扰假设和具体效应数值,不能将设计结论推广至任意干扰结构。

原文摘要

Two-stage randomization is a powerful design for estimating treatment effects in the presence of interference; that is, when one individual’s treatment assignment affects another individual’s outcomes. Our motivating example is a two-stage randomized trial evaluating an intervention to reduce student absenteeism in the School District of Philadelphia. In that experiment, households with multiple students were first assigned to treatment or control; then, in treated households, one student was randomly assigned to treatment. Using this example, we highlight key considerations for analyzing two-stage experiments in practice. Our first contribution is to address additional complexities that arise when household sizes vary; in this case, researchers must decide between assigning equal weight to households or equal weight to individuals. We propose unbiased estimators for a broad class of individual- and household-weighted estimands, with corresponding theoretical and estimated variances. Our second contribution is to connect two common approaches for analyzing two-stage designs: linear regression and randomization inference. We show that, with suitably chosen standard errors, these two approaches yield identical point and variance estimates, which is somewhat surprising given the complex randomization scheme. Finally, we explore options for incorporating covariates to improve precision. We confirm our analytic results via simulation studies and apply these methods to the attendance study, finding substantively meaningful spillover effects.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文