Ensemble projection pursuit for general nonparametric regression
一般非参数回归的集成投影寻踪AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般非参数回归和统计学习;虽涉及分类任务,但没有离散选择行为或所列预测应用的直接证据。
一般非参数回归的集成投影寻踪AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Projection pursuit regression (PPR) and artificial neural networks (ANNs), both introduced around the same time, share a similar approach to approximating complex structures in data. However, PPR has received far less attention than ANNs and other popular statistical learning methods such as random forests (RF) and support vector machines (SVM). In this paper, we revisit the estimation of PPR and propose an optimal greedy algorithm and an ensemble approach via feature bagging, hereafter referred to as ePPR, to improve its effectiveness. Compared to RF, ePPR has two main advantages. First, its theoretical consistency can be proved for more general regression functions, as long as they are L2 integrable, and higher consistency rates can be achieved. Second, ePPR does not split the samples, so each term of the PPR is estimated using the entire data, making minimisation more efficient and ensuring the smoothness of the estimator. Extensive comparisons on real data sets show that ePPR is more efficient in regression and classification than RF and other competitors.