跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究在线随机实验的意向治疗效应,并使用主层、工具变量与协变量调整框架。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Alex Deng
Lo-Hua Yuan
Naoya Kanai

利用零效应降低单侧触发实验中的估计方差

研究问题
在线实验只有少数个体实际接触干预,且触发状态仅在处理组可观测时,如何提高总体意向治疗效应估计的精度并保持无偏?
方法与思路
作者结合 CUPED 的效率增广思路、主层与工具变量识别框架,构造可使用实验前和实验中观测的调整项,要求其期望为零。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,真实实验与模拟中,该估计量能够保持无偏,并取得接近完整观测触发状态时的精度改善,有时超过触发稀释分析。
阅读关注点
应核对增广项的构造、零期望条件的检验方法与检验能力,以及使用实验中变量时如何保证调整有效和估计目标不变。
阅读边界
依据的是 arXiv 预印本摘要,不能确认同行评审或期刊接收;摘要未说明完整条件,零期望假设可检验也不意味着未拒绝即可证实。

原文摘要

In online experiments where the intervention is only exposed, or "triggered", for a small subset of the population, it is critical to use variance reduction techniques to estimate treatment effects with sufficient precision to inform business decisions. Trigger-dilute analysis is often used in these situations, and reduces the sampling variance of overall intent-to-treat (ITT) effects by an order of magnitude equal to the inverse of the triggering rate; for example, a triggering rate of $5\%$ corresponds to roughly a $20x$ reduction in variance. To apply trigger-dilute analysis, one needs to know experimental subjects' triggering counterfactual statuses, i.e., the counterfactual behavior of subjects under both treatment and control conditions. In this paper, we propose an unbiased ITT estimator with reduced variance applicable for experiments where the triggering counterfactual status is only observed in the treatment group. Our method is based on the efficiency augmentation idea of CUPED and draws upon identification frameworks from the principal stratification and instrumental variables literature. The unbiasedness of our estimation approach relies on a testable assumption that the augmentation term used for covariate adjustment equals zero in expectation. Unlike traditional covariate adjustment or principal score modeling approaches, our estimator can incorporate both pre-experiment and in-experiment observations. We demonstrate through a real-world experiment and simulations that our estimator can remain unbiased and achieve precision improvements as large as if triggering status were fully observed, and in some cases can even outperform trigger-dilute analysis.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文