跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要关注高维变量选择和错误发现率,所举应用为基因组关联研究,未提供归入所列计量细分的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

Knockoff 方法的稳健推断

研究问题
当 model-X knockoff 所需的特征联合分布只能估计时,构造误差会如何影响高维变量选择的错误发现率保证?
方法与思路
作者研究不完全正确的 knockoff 副本,将错误发现率膨胀与各特征给定其余特征的条件分布估计误差联系起来。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,结果量化特征分布估计误差引起的错误发现率膨胀,从而为 model-X knockoff 的分布错设稳健性提供依据。
阅读关注点
应核对条件分布误差的度量、错误发现率膨胀界的精确形式,以及副本构造和分布估计所需的数据条件。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未展开误差界和构造条件,变量的条件关联也不能直接解释为因果效应。

原文摘要

We consider the variable selection problem, which seeks to identify important variables influencing a response $Y$ out of many candidate features $X_{1},\ldots ,X_{p}$. We wish to do so while offering finite-sample guarantees about the fraction of false positives—selected variables $X_{j}$ that in fact have no effect on $Y$ after the other features are known. When the number of features $p$ is large (perhaps even larger than the sample size $n$), and we have no prior knowledge regarding the type of dependence between $Y$ and $X$, the model-X knockoffs framework nonetheless allows us to select a model with a guaranteed bound on the false discovery rate, as long as the distribution of the feature vector $X=(X_{1},\dots ,X_{p})$ is exactly known. This model selection procedure operates by constructing “knockoff copies” of each of the $p$ features, which are then used as a control group to ensure that the model selection algorithm is not choosing too many irrelevant features. In this work, we study the practical setting where the distribution of $X$ can only be estimated, rather than known exactly, and the knockoff copies of the $X_{j}$’s are therefore constructed somewhat incorrectly. Our results, which are free of any modeling assumption whatsoever, show that the resulting model selection procedure incurs an inflation of the false discovery rate that is proportional to our errors in estimating the distribution of each feature $X_{j}$ conditional on the remaining features $\{X_{k}:k\neq j\}$. The model-X knockoffs framework is therefore robust to errors in the underlying assumptions on the distribution of $X$, making it an effective method for many practical applications, such as genome-wide association studies, where the underlying distribution on the features $X_{1},\dots ,X_{p}$ is estimated accurately but not known exactly.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文